SCVTalkers
May 22, 2012, 05:19:15 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Santa Clarita's Discussion forum!
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Joe Torre: Potential Owner of the Dodgers?  (Read 358 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
CC
Elite
City Manager
*****

Karma: +34/-46
Posts: 2900


More Cowbell!


View Profile

Ignore
« on: January 04, 2012, 01:53:26 PM »

Joe resigned his position today as the VP of baseball operations for MLB to pursue buying the LA Dodgers with a group of others headed by Rick Caruso (a developer).

I figure this is a serious move so I am keeping my fingers crossed as I highly respect Torre and I like this a whole lot better than the prospect of the Magic Johnson group.  Of course Hershiser and Garvey are sentimental favorites, but I think Joe would be a great leader to the team.

Bids are due by January 23rd so if you want a piece of the Dodgers you might assemble your $800+ millions and make your move.

YAY! JOE!
Logged

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.  Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  #unnecessaryhashtag
ScottE
Intern
*

Karma: +35/-30
Posts: 70


Hypersensitive Tattoo Aficionado


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2012, 02:58:35 PM »

Now can we sing kumbaya?
Logged

What can be asserted without proof, can be dismissed without proof. - Hitchens
CC
Elite
City Manager
*****

Karma: +34/-46
Posts: 2900


More Cowbell!


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2012, 03:15:24 PM »

Yes, this would be an appropriate use of kumbaya.

Namaste
Logged

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.  Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  #unnecessaryhashtag
Alpiner
The Faithful One
1337 H4X0R


Karma: +69/-94
Posts: 5147


Soli Deo Gloria


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2012, 03:27:34 PM »

This makes things very interesting...
Logged

"We, the People of the State of California, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure and perpetuate its blessings, do establish this Constitution." -- CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE.
FiscalCon
Elite
City Council Member
****

Karma: +24/-15
Posts: 1818



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2012, 07:06:24 PM »

I have no interest whatsoever in having a Skankee in charge.  Other than when he was in charge of the overspending Skankees he rarely had an impressive record as a manager.
Logged

From each according to his ability

To each according to his lack therof
SCVTalkers
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2012, 07:06:24 PM »

 Logged
radiomantodd
Intern
*

Karma: +5/-1
Posts: 19


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #5 on: January 06, 2012, 12:05:38 PM »

I have no interest whatsoever in having a Skankee in charge.  Other than when he was in charge of the overspending Skankees he rarely had an impressive record as a manager.

Funny, I seem to recall him taking us to the playoffs and winning the western division two of his 3 years.

Being as how he grew up in Brooklyn when the Dodgers were still there... I'm gonna go ahead and say he's a good guy to be part owner of the team. 
Logged
FiscalCon
Elite
City Council Member
****

Karma: +24/-15
Posts: 1818



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2012, 11:43:25 PM »

Because he lived in Brooklyn makes him a good Dodger?

Actually, it appears he grew up a Giants fan.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/29/sports/baseball/joe-torre-and-baseball-putting-the-focus-on-prostate-cancer.html

yes he had 2 good seasons with the Dodgers, hence the "rarely" word.
Mets- 286-420 in  5 years
Braves-playoffs 257-229 of 3 years
Cardinals-351-354
Dodgers 259-227

ttl non Yankee  1153-1230
http://www.baseball-reference.com/managers/torrejo01.shtml

Joe Girardi only had 1 year (78-84) with the Marlins and his winning percentage with NY is only .12 less than Torre's.
http://www.baseball-reference.com/managers/girarjo01.shtml
 
Logged

From each according to his ability

To each according to his lack therof
radiomantodd
Intern
*

Karma: +5/-1
Posts: 19


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #7 on: January 09, 2012, 08:37:53 AM »

Because he lived in Brooklyn makes him a good Dodger?

Actually, it appears he grew up a Giants fan.
 

Well then, that he'd abandon allegiance for the Hated Ones, that speaks even more. 

Continue to hate on him, but I think he's a good fit.  So far, all of the potential owners who have outed themselves are a much better fit that McCourt turned out to be.  Now that I hear Roy Disney's heirs want in, I'm even more excited.  The only thing I don't want is Time Warner or Fox owning the team again.  That ain't right.
Logged
FiscalCon
Elite
City Council Member
****

Karma: +24/-15
Posts: 1818



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2012, 08:44:17 AM »

You must think that allegiances can be changed much easier than I do.

I'm with you on the cable thing.  I don't think that would fly well with the fans after Fox.
Logged

From each according to his ability

To each according to his lack therof
Mike
Mikeintosh
Elite
1337 H4X0R


Karma: +55/-17
Posts: 6028



View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2012, 11:34:44 AM »

Do we have any sort of track record of these celebrity partners actually making a difference in the way the team is run, in the long term? It seems to me, the team's future makeup and the fans' experience (at the stadium and elsewhere) is much more a function of who writes the checks.

To that end, you want an independently wealthy owner who wants to win and make money, with an emphasis on the former. A guy who will use his gut to make a big acquisition, yet still keep the team afloat.

From a fan's perspective, publicaly-owned company is just about the worst fit, only slightly better than an over-leveraged fool like McCourt.
Logged
Alpiner
The Faithful One
1337 H4X0R


Karma: +69/-94
Posts: 5147


Soli Deo Gloria


View Profile

Ignore
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2012, 02:21:37 PM »

Mike, I wholeheartedly agree with you!
Logged

"We, the People of the State of California, grateful to Almighty God for our freedom, in order to secure and perpetuate its blessings, do establish this Constitution." -- CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION PREAMBLE.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.15 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.069 seconds with 21 queries.